Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Features I need before I can pay for NCrunch.
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
otac0n
#1 Posted : Wednesday, October 3, 2012 6:08:37 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/22/2011(UTC)
Posts: 51
Location: Seattle, WA

Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 7 post(s)
With NCrunch as a free tool, it is easy to justify shortcomings, but I can't justify a $150 tool that doesn't do EXACTLY what I need it to.

Don't get me wrong, NCrunch does SO MUCH right, but so do a lot of $50-ish tools like Beyond Compare, Regex Buddy, and Sublime Text. $150 demands a very high level of polish.

My three big features that would make the cost justifiable:


  1. Better hybrid operating modes, like: "Run all tests for saved files, but impacted tests for files that have un-saved edits in the editor."
  2. Data-driven test support for MSTest.
  3. Real support for "inconclusive" tests. (Don't just mask inconclusive tests as pass or fail.)


These are the only things that actually get in my way on a daily basis. To be perfectly honest, I would probably buy it if just two out of these three were to be fixed.
Back to top
WWW
Remco
#2 Posted : Wednesday, October 3, 2012 9:07:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: NCrunch Developer

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 4/16/2011(UTC)
Posts: 6,974

Thanks: 929 times
Was thanked: 1256 time(s) in 1169 post(s)
Hi,

Thanks for sharing this feedback. I'll see what I can do.


Cheers,

Remco
Back to top
Der-Albert.com
#3 Posted : Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:38:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/17/2011(UTC)
Posts: 175

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 38 time(s) in 35 post(s)
otac0n;2909 wrote:



  1. Real support for "inconclusive" tests. (Don't just mask inconclusive tests as pass or fail.)



I second that, the third state is a must.

But i have bougth it anyway ;)
Back to top
BLOG
2 users thanked Der-Albert.com for this useful post.
Remco on 10/18/2012(UTC), DanHil on 6/26/2013(UTC)
eviltobz
#4 Posted : Monday, April 29, 2013 10:09:41 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/29/2013(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: United Kingdom

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Der-Albert.com;3010 wrote:
otac0n;2909 wrote:


  1. Real support for "inconclusive" tests. (Don't just mask inconclusive tests as pass or fail.)


I second that, the third state is a must.
But i have bougth it anyway ;)

Likewise - my company got me a licence, but I'd really like better support for inconclusives. When TDDing I like to be able to stick an inconclusive test as a placeholder against new classes that fall out as a reminder to get back to it. I don't want them to pass as they need to show up, but I don't want em to fail as that gives an incorrect view of the true state, so I need to keep looking into the details to see if my code is passing its tests.

maybe just adding an additional filter to the NCrunch Tests windowalongside the show passing, failing, unexecuted & ignored filters would be enough. keep all the rest of the reporting, passing, failing and whatnot as it is, but just give that view to show that some of the tests got where they are because of their inconclusiveness.
Back to top
1 user thanked eviltobz for this useful post.
DanHil on 6/26/2013(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.044 seconds.
Trial NCrunch
Take NCrunch for a spin
Do your fingers a favour and supercharge your testing workflow
Free Download