Forum member
otac0n
51 posts
Posts by otac0n
-
Copying large files using [DeploymentItem] is a race condition?
About 50% of the time, I have tests failing, because one of our deployment items is very large. This appears to be because copying the file takes longer than starting up the test engine, as we are getting a FileNotFound.
10 Mar 2012 00:09 UTC
-
Config file manipulations fail
DeploymentItem can be applied per-class, as well.
09 Mar 2012 22:54 UTC
-
workspaces taking a lot of disc space
I had a 4GB ramdisk, and it kept getting filled up. I would have to disable/reenabe NCrunch (or restart the solution) to get it to clean up.
06 Mar 2012 17:08 UTC
-
Aggressive Caching on Forum Giving incorrect Read/Unread indicators.
No problem. My guess is that it is cached in a cookie, and that reading a post does not invalidate the cookie for the parent forum.
06 Mar 2012 17:07 UTC
-
Aggressive Caching on Forum Giving incorrect Read/Unread indicators.
I don't know if you are aware or not, but it appears that the indicators on the forum software you are using are broken. After reading a thread, it seems like I have to clear my cookies to get it to show up as read. *EDIT* Actually, it seems that if you read the last unread thread in a forum,…
06 Mar 2012 02:35 UTC
-
"Risk/Progress" - distinction beetwen "failed this run" and "failed last run"
You could just have the number count down as tests from the last run are fixed (or deleted).
27 Feb 2012 07:51 UTC
-
Recursive code being edited can sometimes cause NCrunch workers to die horriffically.
I don't mind the processes getting torn down, but I would like to avoid the "Windows Error Reporting" boxes from popping up in front of Visual Studio. Possibly helpful: http://stackoverflow.com/a/1599236/57986
27 Feb 2012 07:30 UTC
-
Recursive code being edited can sometimes cause NCrunch workers to die horriffically.
When working with some recursive code, you can get into a situation where the code is infinetly recursive, and the resulting StackOverflowException crashes the workers. Just as a contrived example: [code=csharp][Test] Example_DoesNotStackOverflow() { Example("abc"); } private void E…
22 Feb 2012 00:10 UTC
-
Add NCrunch.Framework to NuGet
Respectfully, I don't see how putting the assemblies on NuGet "will only make this worse". People "create version inconsistencies" by upgrading NCrunch to the next version, NOT by referencing a new Framework version. The framework version is only going to be updated when the NEW version of NCrun…
18 Feb 2012 00:40 UTC
-
ETA of MSTest data driven tests?
At this point, I'm willing to pay many of my dollars, or spend many hours of my time to get this feature.
18 Feb 2012 00:21 UTC
-
New feature (cosmetical) request
For me, it is all of them, but especially the vertical line. It appears as though the vertical line does not coincide with the hit-box at all.
18 Feb 2012 00:20 UTC
-
New feature (cosmetical) request
As a side note to this, I have to say that it is very difficult for me to hover over the X to even click it. The hit-box is quite small, and I don't think that it changes when you switch the marker style (that is, switching to the Rectangle or VerticalLine still has the same, small click area.)
15 Feb 2012 22:00 UTC
-
v1.37b - Debug variables
I'm getting these results in iterator blocks (methods with `yield return` in them).
15 Feb 2012 21:59 UTC
-
Add NCrunch.Framework to NuGet
The same problem would arise when more than one person are sharing a solution as well, so I'm not sure how that affects the decision to use NuGet.
15 Feb 2012 21:53 UTC
-
Problem with NUnit TestCase attribute
Yeah, I see your points. I guess that a success for ignored tests is acceptable. At least it would get 99% of people up and running.
06 Feb 2012 21:11 UTC
-
Problem with NUnit TestCase attribute
It doesn't really make sense to consider the tests as passed, either. It would be better if they show up as though they never ran. Ideally, they should show up as though they are ignored (this probably applies to calls to Assert.Ignore() as well).
05 Feb 2012 21:18 UTC
-
Problem with NUnit TestCase attribute
It looks like [Theory] and [TestCase] are working, but I believe that the behavior of Assume is incorrect. Assume.That(false) should never cause an individual test case to fail, it should instead be considered inconclusive (or ignored, if that is easier). Right now, my solution shows 137 "fail…
05 Feb 2012 05:42 UTC
-
ETA of MSTest data driven tests?
I was excited to see that a big release of NCrunch was out today, great work. However, I have subsequently been disappointed when it turned out that MSTest data driven tests were still unsupported. This is a feature I like to use on almost all of my tests, since it reduces the amount of test c…
31 Jan 2012 18:22 UTC
-
TreeView / DataGrid Hybrid control
[quote=Remco;700]I wish I could say it was free, but I did have to pay for it.[/quote] I suppose that is the main reason that it is closed source, then? It seems to be pretty pricy.
08 Dec 2011 02:55 UTC
-
TreeView / DataGrid Hybrid control
Just out of curiosity, what control are you using for the "NCrunch tests" window, and the "NCrunch Processing Queue"? I've been looking everywhere for a control that had those capabilities (tree / grid), but could not find anyone who knew about them.
08 Dec 2011 01:40 UTC