Forum member

onovotny

12 posts

Posts by onovotny

  1. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    I saw issues both with VS IntelliSense, VS Builds and with R#. I suspect R# was the same underlying issue as VS as R# gets much of its data from the VS object model. NCrunch was the only thing that built ok in that case :/

    20 Mar 2017 12:16 UTC

  2. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    Hmm...actually, spoke a little too soon. While using a conditional on the TargetFrameworks element allowed NCrunch to work, I had tons of other issues within P2P refs in VS. The UWP -> System.Reactive project wouldn't even build that way. I don't think conditionals will work here :/ I'll have to…

    20 Mar 2017 01:18 UTC

  3. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    > As the situation stands, support for this feature has been around for just 5 days, so this is still a very immature feature. You may need to make some compromises here for the time being. Totally get it and making that change worked. Was making a suggestion as an enhancement for NCrunch to dete…

    19 Mar 2017 23:45 UTC

  4. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    I really don't like the idea of putting tool specific information in my project file like that. It would be much cleaner if NCrunch could read the TFM list and then use a /p:TargetFrameworks=foo parameter as it builds and can filter out only the TFM's it supports (net and netcoreapp). Then projects …

    19 Mar 2017 12:49 UTC

  5. Support for xUnit 2.2

    What you're doing goes against the explicit design goal of xUnit. Runners are not supposed to dictate which version of xunit.core a library author uses. Xunit.runner.utility, is version independent and xunit.runner.utillity 2.1 *can* launch tests against xunit.core 2.2, for example. That's why abstr…

    19 Mar 2017 12:45 UTC

  6. Support for xUnit 2.2

    I saw that there are binding redirects for the desktop version. In consultation with Brad Wilson, we don't think that should be needed and could break things. Runners like NCrunch should be using the xunit.runner.utility library, the abstractions library and that's it -- they should definitely not h…

    18 Mar 2017 23:28 UTC

  7. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    The other issues I'm hitting are related to App Domains -- namely that it cannot load System.Reactive.dll and when I look at the AppDomain.Current.BaseDirectory, indeed it's not there.

    18 Mar 2017 23:22 UTC

  8. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    Hi, I don't expect UWP to work directly with NCrunch, but the library itself multi-targets it: https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/Rx.NET/blob/develop/Rx.NET/Source/src/System.Reactive/System.Reactive.csproj One thing NCrunch can do to improve perf is to pass /p:TargetFramework= foo and …

    18 Mar 2017 23:21 UTC

  9. Support for xUnit 2.2

    NCrunch currently ships with xUnit 2.1. xUnit 2.2 contains numerous performance enhancements, over 2.1 -- I would strongly suggest updating to that.

    18 Mar 2017 14:20 UTC

  10. Cannot get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch

    Hi, I'm getting several different errors trying to get Rx.NET to work with NCrunch. It all builds/tests correctly in VS and in the xunit console runners. You can see it here: https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/Rx.NET/ checkout the add-ncrunch branch Open Rx.NET\Source\System.Reactiv…

    18 Mar 2017 14:17 UTC

  11. Build fails due to dependency on .git directory

    Okay, fixed it and submitted a PR to GitVersion to make my fix part of the default.

    18 Mar 2017 14:13 UTC

  12. Build fails due to dependency on .git directory

    If you use GitVersionTask to update the assembly info files in any of the projects, NCrunch will fail to build it. This leads to errors with SDK-style projects because the Version won't be set and targets will fail. GitVersionTask looks up the directory tree for the .git directory. NCrunch: If…

    17 Mar 2017 13:57 UTC