Forum member

jonskeet

13 posts

Posts by jonskeet

  1. Code coverage indicators not appearing

    [quote=Remco;3850] Thanks for posting! Generally this problem stems from a bug in Visual Studio that corrupts the adornment layer used by NCrunch to display coverage markers. The bug can be triggered by VS package install/reinstall/uninstall actions, NCrunch upgrades, etc. Forcing Visual Studio…

    17 Mar 2013 09:25 UTC

  2. Code coverage indicators not appearing

    I'm pretty sure code coverage is working in general, as the metrics seem pretty reasonable - but I can't get the indicators to show. I've messed around with every coverage-related aspect of the configuration, but I'm just not seeing anything. Are there any known issues with other plugins (e.g.…

    16 Mar 2013 17:37 UTC

  3. "Build in progress" for extended periods?

    [quote=Remco;1173]If there's an out of memory exception, then you're sure to get an explosion. If your system hangs with a build in progress, it's worth checking what's happening in the processing queue. If the queue itself doesn't show any data (or doesn't refresh), then this is the same issue sh…

    21 Feb 2012 19:47 UTC

  4. "Build in progress" for extended periods?

    I'm using Visual Studio 2010 (Pro) with NCrunch 1.37.0.46b, and I've noticed that recently it's spent a long time not running tests, with messages in the test window such as: "4405 tests are queued for execution. Monitoring 4484 tests (4 failing) with no tests ignored - build in progress" The …

    12 Feb 2012 19:48 UTC

  5. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;773]Good to hear! I'd be lying if I said that NUnit didn't put up a fight on this one, but persistence pays as always :)[/quote] The results really are great. [quote=Remco;773] For the grouping, I was thinking that you may be able to reduce the number of test cases by finding co…

    19 Dec 2011 09:19 UTC

  6. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;770] Thanks for providing the links to your working solution. This was enormously helpful for me in making some critical changes to the way the NUnit integration works for NCrunch 1.36b. [/quote] Well if I'm going to ask you to make some changes, the least I can do is a bit of inv…

    19 Dec 2011 08:35 UTC

  7. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;549]I'm always on the lookout for good test solutions, so that would really be useful. Is there is a specific revision number/id that I can grab which is unfixed?[/quote] Sure - this is the revision before the fix: http://code.google.com/p/noda-time/source/detail?r=131731305179702e…

    21 Oct 2011 06:37 UTC

  8. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;547]Sorry about this. I wish I had a better answer or a workaround, though the best I can suggest is to keep an eye out and know that this will be supported in future.[/quote] No problem - let me know if I can help out at all. If you want to try to Noda Time tests, I can help you …

    20 Oct 2011 22:25 UTC

  9. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;544]Hmmm... What kind of result would you normally expect from a name mismatch in the test case data?[/quote] It's not a name mismatch. It's giving the test data item a name so that it can show up in the list of tests. It's metadata, effectively. The test code I gave you should pass …

    20 Oct 2011 08:56 UTC

  10. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    [quote=Remco;542] Thanks for posting. The problems you're describing are caused by NCrunch's inability to determine (and display) a difference between an inconclusive test result and a genuine failure. Right now (for the sake of simplicity) NCrunch doesn't have an 'inconclusive' status, so the UI…

    20 Oct 2011 07:52 UTC

  11. Issues with NUnit TestCaseSource

    I've just downloaded NCrunch 1.35.0.16b, and have come up against two issues with TestCaseSource handling: 1) If there's no test data for a particular test, that counts as a full-on failure in NCrunch, whereas it's more like an "ignored" test in NUnit itself. 2) If the test data implements ITest…

    19 Oct 2011 18:49 UTC

  12. Alternatives for coverage indicators

    [quote=Remco;423] 1. Change the shape of the marker (i.e. make it smaller, or shaped in a way that won't hide a cursor sitting within the same character space) 2. Fade the marker out with an alpha - You'll notice NCrunch does this already when the coverage results are out of date. The alpha effec…

    25 Sep 2011 11:55 UTC

  13. Alternatives for coverage indicators

    I've just started using NCrunch, and I love it so far. However, I'm finding the coverage indicators (the blobs on the left of the screen) a little inconvenient. In particular, this morning I clicked on a stack trace to get to the line causing a problem - and found it hard to see my cursor, becaus…

    25 Sep 2011 11:25 UTC