Forum member

Pjotrtje

7 posts

Posts by Pjotrtje

  1. Ternary Operators

    Ok. Than I just have te remember that a green dot in front of: var x1 = x2 == x3 ? x4 : x5; or var x1 = x2 ?? x3 ?? x4; Does not mean it is completely covered but only the line is 'touched' during a test. Not perfect, but do-able :).

  2. xUnit V2 theory of non basic types + NCrunch = giving wrong results?

    Hey Remco, Downloaded the latest version and now have no incorrect succeeding test! Thanks. Greetings, Pieter

  3. Ternary Operators

    Hey, Too bad. Visual Studio code coverage tool does seem to be accurate though. Nevertheless, forme the big problem is not that NCrunch cannot determine whether a Ternary Operators is completely tested. But that it shows that it IS completely tested. I have no clue how your algorith is. But …

  4. Ternary Operators

    Hey Remco, We are still evaluating NCrunch. And I run into the same problem as listed below: http://forum.ncrunch.net/yaf_postst963_Ternary-Operators-should-indicate-when-only-one-condition-is-covered.aspx We also have in our code a lot of: var x = hasXxx ? x1 : x2; And the…

  5. xUnit V2 theory of non basic types + NCrunch = giving wrong results?

    Ok. Thanks!

  6. xUnit V2 theory of non basic types + NCrunch = giving wrong results?

    Hey Remco, It kinda makes sense :). I am unlucky to test NCrunch in the week xUnit 2 is released :). "When I run your tests against the current development build of NCrunch (which is integrated with XUnit V2 RTM), I see the same results as the VS test runner. So you can expect that these inconsi…

  7. xUnit V2 theory of non basic types + NCrunch = giving wrong results?

    Hey, I really like the idea of NCrunch! Therefore I am testing it right now and I wanna try to convince my coleagues next week they should use it to and after that my boss so he will buy it when the trial is over! But while testing I have some issue with some test. I think I do everything OK and th…