When statements that include chained method calls are formatted across multiple lines only the first line is identified as covered, other lines are reported as not covered, which in turn affects coverage metrics calculations.

I have the following in a C# class

var errorMessages = exception.EntityValidationErrors
.SelectMany(x => x.ValidationErrors)
.Select(x => x.ErrorMessage);

In the editor the SelectMany and Select parts of the statement have a dot indicating the line is not covered, and the metrics window shows the file as being only 95.53% covered

If I reformat the statement so that it is on a single line, the line is marked as covered in the editor and the metrics window shows the file as being 100% covered.

I use ReSharper CleanUp extensively and have it configured to format chained method calls across multiple lines. I personally find this more readable.

I feel NCrunch should recognise this as a single statement, at least for metrics reporting.

Mike Hanson

Thanks for the quick response Remco.

I understand better now why this occurs, but that suggests there might be something else not quite right.

The very next statement after the aforementioned one is:

var fullErrorMessage = string.Join("; ", errorMessages);

And this statement is recognised as fully covered.

The full method shown below, is a private member of a Repository class and it simply wraps a call to the SaveChanges method of an internal DbContext. All the method does is provide a more informative message, when DbEntityValidationException is caught.

private void SaveChanges()
{
try
{
this.context.SaveChanges();
}
catch (DbEntityValidationException exception)
{
var errorMessages = exception.EntityValidationErrors
.SelectMany(x => x.ValidationErrors)
.Select(x => x.ErrorMessage);

var fullErrorMessage = string.Join("; ", errorMessages);

var exceptionMessage = string.Concat(exception.Message, " The validation errors are: ", fullErrorMessage);

throw new DbEntityValidationException(exceptionMessage, exception.EntityValidationErrors);
}
}

The only two lines that are flagged as not covered are the Select* lines. In this case I can "fix" the coverage stats by restoring it to a single line (the chances of this class being changed again are very small), which will please the people complaining about the total coverage on the solution being below 95%, but it would be interesting to understand more.

Mike

I see, I will double check the tests to make sure something is returned. I remember when I wrote this some time ago that creating test ValidationError and ValidationResult objects for testing purposes was very messy. So very possible we skipped some tests on the basis of value vs time invested.

Thanks for the explanations though.

Mike