Remco;7436 wrote: I realise the limitations of this as it is useful to be able to know if there are ignored tests in the codebase.
This is exactly our problem. We run our tests with NCrunch on dev machines but with other runners in the build pipeline. So we want to standardize on the NUnit Ignore tag, but then we lose all visibility on these tests in NCrunch.
The most common reason for an Ignore for us is if a test becomes broken and needs additional consideration to fix. We sometimes choose to temporarily disable it, but with NCrunch we lose visibility on that test and it can get disabled indefinitely. We're using an NUnit category as a workaround, but then we have to manually configure other test runner configs to ignore this category, which gets a little kludgey. We also lose the ability to directly associate a comment with the Ignore tag, which NUnit's tag supports.
So I wondered if there's been any thought to revisiting this. It seems like framework-ignored tests could behave in NCrunch like NCrunch's own Ignored tests, just that the franework-ignored would be configured declaratively in code.