Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Any Plans to optimize ASP.NET, .NET Core Experience?
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
Der-Albert.com
#1 Posted : Thursday, March 16, 2017 5:39:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/17/2011(UTC)
Posts: 209

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 55 time(s) in 51 post(s)
Hi Remco,

i know, it's the first Version of .net core project support, but it seems quite slow, even when it is only the new project type in an ASP.NET Core on .net 4.6 Solution.

Any Ideas how to improve the experience over time, or is this done and not possible.

Best Regards

Albert
Back to top
BLOG
Remco
#2 Posted : Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:12:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: NCrunch Developer

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 4/16/2011(UTC)
Posts: 7,145

Thanks: 960 times
Was thanked: 1290 time(s) in 1196 post(s)
Hi Albert,

If you haven't already, I recommend giving the new version (v3.6) a spin. This included several changes to improve performance around synchronisation of .NET Core codebases.

That aside, can you share any more details about performance issues your experiencing? Which actions seem unusually slow?
Back to top
Der-Albert.com
#3 Posted : Monday, March 20, 2017 7:34:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/17/2011(UTC)
Posts: 209

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 55 time(s) in 51 post(s)
No was still on 3.5, with 3.6 i have that problem http://forum.ncrunch.net...mageFormatException.aspx
Back to top
BLOG
Remco
#4 Posted : Monday, March 20, 2017 10:18:17 PM(UTC)
Rank: NCrunch Developer

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 4/16/2011(UTC)
Posts: 7,145

Thanks: 960 times
Was thanked: 1290 time(s) in 1196 post(s)
Ok, I'll try to help troubleshoot the assembly referencing issue in the other thread. When we get you up and running, I'll be interested to learn more about the performance of v3.6 on your system and whether there are any specific areas that need work.
Back to top
Der-Albert.com
#5 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 8:01:31 AM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/17/2011(UTC)
Posts: 209

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 55 time(s) in 51 post(s)
With 3.6/7 it is faster than 3.5, feeling not as fast yet as in normal C# Assemblies, but now i can feel the progress. before that it takes ages even to build the projects.
Back to top
BLOG
Remco
#6 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 8:34:08 AM(UTC)
Rank: NCrunch Developer

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 4/16/2011(UTC)
Posts: 7,145

Thanks: 960 times
Was thanked: 1290 time(s) in 1196 post(s)
Der-Albert.com;10112 wrote:
With 3.6/7 it is faster than 3.5, feeling not as fast yet as in normal C# Assemblies, but now i can feel the progress. before that it takes ages even to build the projects.


If you're able to highlight any areas you feel seem to be significantly slower, I can try to learn more about why this might be the case.

Turning on the track engine performance setting would be very useful for this. You can then see the individual steps NCrunch is taking in pursuit of test execution. If you get any traces that seem longer than they should be, you can also export them and upload them to the contact form on this website, or email them to me.
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.
Trial NCrunch
Take NCrunch for a spin
Do your fingers a favour and supercharge your testing workflow
Free Download