Sticking this on the forums in addition to the "submit bug report" in case others are getting this, or I'm doing it wrong :)
I've noticed that to use TestCaseSource NUnit attributes with NCrunch, you have to also decorate the test with the TestCase attribute. The NUnit docs (http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=testCaseSource&r=2.5) say actually you should combine with the Test attribute, not TestCase. Combining with TestCase causes other runners to think that there's a separate test for which I've not provided enough arguments.
Using [Test] appears to be preferred by the R#6 test runner too, and NUnit's runner correctly shows no blank tests if you use the Test attribute, but NCrunch is now something I can't do without ;)
Build/Test Issues
TestCaseSource attribute incorrectly requires TestCase attribute, not Test?
Started by alexnorcliffe on 9,475 views
Remco NCrunch Developer
#407
23 Sep 2011 14:56 UTC
I'm amazed that it's possible to get TestCaseSource working at all, as so far I've made no effort to support it :)
Thanks for reporting this one. I'll have a look at it.
Thanks for reporting this one. I'll have a look at it.
Does the same apply to Value and Range parameter attributes?
Marking a test with TestCase actually runs each range, but with Test it doesn't even identify that it's a valid test (black dots)
Likewise, this is actually invalid as it should be a Test attribute (to make it work in R#6 and NUnit runners)
Maybe TestCase unwittingly uses NUnit's real logic for spotting a test? :)
Marking a test with TestCase actually runs each range, but with Test it doesn't even identify that it's a valid test (black dots)
Likewise, this is actually invalid as it should be a Test attribute (to make it work in R#6 and NUnit runners)
Maybe TestCase unwittingly uses NUnit's real logic for spotting a test? :)
Remco NCrunch Developer
#410
23 Sep 2011 16:13 UTC
I think what's happening is that NCrunch only considers a test to be a test if it has either a [Test] attribute or a [TestCase] attribute with parameters on the method signature.
So if a test is marked with TestCaseSource and has parameters, then NCrunch thinks it can't be a [Test].
I don't think this one will be a big deal to fix. I'm planning a big blitz on NUnit 2.5 features soon, as many people are asking for them - this includes Value and Range parameter attributes :)
So if a test is marked with TestCaseSource and has parameters, then NCrunch thinks it can't be a [Test].
I don't think this one will be a big deal to fix. I'm planning a big blitz on NUnit 2.5 features soon, as many people are asking for them - this includes Value and Range parameter attributes :)
Remco NCrunch Developer
#527
18 Oct 2011 18:34 UTC
This issue should be fixed in the 1.35b build that was released this morning.
I can confirm that TestCaseSource is working nicely for one of the new tests I wrote to take advantage of it. There's nothing quite like generating 8000+ test cases dynamically. :)
Post a reply
Log in to reply.