Forum member

Remco NCrunch Developer

7586 posts

Posts by Remco

  1. .net 4.7.1 support

    Hi, Support for .NET 4.7.1 went out officially with the 3.12 release. To my knowledge, it seems to be stable. I think the problem you're experiencing is something entirely different. Can you make sure you're running on the latest 3.12 release from the download page, and try deleting the cont…

  2. Throws exception when using Ninject.Extensions.Conventions

    [quote=Brondahl;11664] But for future developers suffering the problem. That setting does fix it :) (@Remco, can you / do you want to edit the thread subject line to indicate that a fix was found, albeit a debatably imperfect one?)[/quote] Unfortunately this forum doesn't seem to let me rename …

  3. Copy additional files also need CopyReferencedAssembliesToWorkspace

    Hi, thanks for posting! It's difficult to give a solid answer here without fully understanding the mechanism used by this Nuget package to copy the DLL into the bin\x64\Debug\net462\x64 directory. Is this a publicly available Nuget package? I might be able to take a look to see how it copies th…

  4. Required dlls/tools in nuget package not being copied for ncrunch

    Hi James, Thanks for posting! As you probably know, NCrunch works by extracting your projects from your 'foreground' solution into isolated sandboxes, where it can then build them and link them together into runtime environments. For NCrunch's features to work correctly, it's important that e…

  5. Throws exception when using Ninject.Extensions.Conventions

    As Ninject is a runtime framework, there is a high chance that other solutions exist that won't require the 'Copy referenced assemblies to workspace' setting to be enabled forcefully by the engine. Unfortunately I'm not personally familiar enough with the internals of Ninject or how it resolves ass…

  6. OneTimeTearDown is called more than once

    [quote=berkeleybross;11655] I see what you're saying. On the off chance you have experience with this kind of thing, would you recommend any strategies for detecting orphans? I like the idea that I can "adopt" orphans from previous processes but how would you identify which ones are "in use"? Would…

  7. OneTimeTearDown is called more than once

    Hi, thanks for posting! Effective cleanup of resources at the end of a test run is difficult to do, because of the nature of automated testing. The key underlying problem is that there is no way to be certain that the cleanup code will have a chance to run. For example, if the test process ex…

  8. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    You're welcome. Happy to help :)

  9. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    Thanks for the bug report. I think it's becoming clear now what's happening here. In your engine mode, you've made use of an override for the 'Tests to execute on this machine' setting. This setting is intended to control which machines are used to execute specific tests when using distributed …

  10. ncrunch 3.12.0.15

    [quote=jenseralmeida;11646]This week I was able to install the version without any false positive detection by windows defender. Thank you for your support and attention.[/quote] Great to hear! But if thanks are involved, they're probably better due to MS rather than myself. It seems they've fi…

  11. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    Would you be interested in trying the build below? [url=http://downloads.ncrunch.net/NCrunch_Console_3.12.0.16.msi]http://downloads.ncrunch.net/NCrunch_Console_3.12.0.16.msi[/url] [url=http://downloads.ncrunch.net/NCrunch_Console_3.12.0.16.zip]http://downloads.ncrunch.net/NCrunch_Console_3.12.0.…

  12. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    Thanks for sending through the bug report. The log is interesting. According to the report, there are no internal errors being kicked up by the engine and no tasks are being executed. I'm wondering if this might be an issue with the message itself. The next time this happens, can you check in …

  13. DataTestMethod with Enumerators fail in NCrunch

    Great! Thanks for confirming!

  14. Test status shows test running forever but no processing in the queue

    Hi, sorry that your request slipped my net. I've taken a look at the bug report you submitted, and this appears to be a compatibility issue with LightBDD: System.InvalidOperationException: FeatureCoordinator of LightBDD.XUnit2.Implementation.XUnit2FeatureCoordinator type is already installed …

  15. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    Thanks. Can you produce this consistently? Is it the same tests involved every time? It should be possible to tell which tests are being run by setting the Tests Window to group by Test, then sort in order of state. Edit: It looks like the only way the engine can end up in this state (with ta…

  16. Tests queued for execution but no tests being executed

    This can be the case if the tests are making use of NCrunch.Framework.RequiredCapabilityAttribute. Is there anything interesting about these tests that makes them different from others in your suite? Does it consistently happen for the same set of tests?

  17. copying additional files from a folder with name starting with % throws error

    [quote=MartijnBosRHM;11632]Ah I see what you mean. This would be a shakey solution in my opinion, but could work when there are not to many directories with a percentage sign that contain a file with a percentage sign. [/quote] Yes, it absolutely is. This is a defect in NCrunch and it will be f…

  18. copying additional files from a folder with name starting with % throws error

    [quote=MartijnBosRHM;11626] I was not able to add a line to the Additional Files To Include setting with an environment variable in it. Is it possible to set a line using an environment variable in the Additional Files To Include setting? If not, is it valid to interpret double %-sign as an envir…

  19. netcoreapp 2.0 problems

    [quote=Der-Albert.com;11627]Btw. NCrunch 3.12 survived the Upgrade to .NET Core SDK 2.1.2 ;) (and several previews of that)[/quote] Good!!! Maybe we're getting more future proof here :)

  20. Having async/await Impact Detection Problems

    Hi, thanks for sharing this problem. Are you able to construct a sample that can produce these problems?